Abstract

This thesis investigates the impact of decision-making autonomy, a sense of shared identity, and communication strategy on resource retention following mergers and acquisitions. Grounded in organizational development literature, the study examines employee experiences during post-integration periods. Using a qualitative methodology, ten semi-structured interviews were conducted with employees who remained with their organizations for at least twelve months following a merger or acquisition. The research utilizes thematic analysis to explore how autonomy constraints, leadership engagement, transparent communication, and cultural alignment influence retention decisions. The participant sample spans diverse industries such as software, healthcare, financial services, and others, with roles ranging from individual contributors to senior leaders. Results identify seven thematic clusters including autonomy-related issues, communication challenges, identity misalignment, and feedback limitations. Findings suggest that autonomy in decision-making, clarity in communication, and fostering a shared organizational identity positively impact employee retention. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

Library of Congress Subject Headings

Consolidation and merger of corporations—Psychological aspects; Employee retention; Communication in management; Autonomy (Psychology)

Date of Award

2025

School Affiliation

George L. Graziadio School of Business and Management

Department/Program

Business

Degree Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Masters

Faculty Advisor

Kent Rhodes

Share

COinS