Pepperdine Digital Commons - Seaver College Research And Scholarly Achievement Symposium: Framed Just Right: Media Framing of the Affordable Care Act During COVID-19
 

Framed Just Right: Media Framing of the Affordable Care Act During COVID-19

Author(s)

Kyle OyamaFollow

Presentation Type

Oral Presentation

Presentation Type

Submission

Keywords

media politics; framing; Affordable Care Act

Department

Political Science

Major

Political Science

Abstract

This study is a content analysis of New York Times (NYT) articles covering the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that examined the use of frames and covered topics to observe ACA coverage throughout COVID-19. This study utilized methods from Jahng and Littau’s (2022) study to see if trends in framing differed between their pre-COVID-19 and this study’s COVID-19 time frame. Results indicate that framing tendencies during COVID-19 are similar to pre-COVID-19 tendencies with episodic-policy and thematic frames being the most utilized frame types. Framing was typically correlated with the pertinent themes of the time which were typically either a focus on the politics around the act or the ACA’s effect on poor or uninsured Americans. Ultimately, results indicate that framing of the ACA reflects the issues and events presently affecting the nation, which may have a larger effect on public sentiment towards the act and the American healthcare system.

Faculty Mentor

Dr. Brian Newman

Funding Source or Research Program

Political Science Honors Program

Location

Black Family Plaza Classroom 189

Start Date

11-4-2025 2:45 PM

End Date

11-4-2025 3:00 PM

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 11th, 2:45 PM Apr 11th, 3:00 PM

Framed Just Right: Media Framing of the Affordable Care Act During COVID-19

Black Family Plaza Classroom 189

This study is a content analysis of New York Times (NYT) articles covering the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that examined the use of frames and covered topics to observe ACA coverage throughout COVID-19. This study utilized methods from Jahng and Littau’s (2022) study to see if trends in framing differed between their pre-COVID-19 and this study’s COVID-19 time frame. Results indicate that framing tendencies during COVID-19 are similar to pre-COVID-19 tendencies with episodic-policy and thematic frames being the most utilized frame types. Framing was typically correlated with the pertinent themes of the time which were typically either a focus on the politics around the act or the ACA’s effect on poor or uninsured Americans. Ultimately, results indicate that framing of the ACA reflects the issues and events presently affecting the nation, which may have a larger effect on public sentiment towards the act and the American healthcare system.