Prudence as a Prerequisite for Active Love: A Comparison of Dostoevsky’s Alyosha Karamazov and Prince Myshkin

Presentation Type

Poster

Keywords

Dostoevsky, Brothers Karamazov, Idiot, Prudence, Active Love

Department

English

Major

Philosophy

Abstract

This essay considers the fundamental difference between Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Alyosha Karamazov and Prince Myshkin, in The Brothers Karamazov and The Idiot, respectively. It analyzes Alyosha’s success—and Myshkin’s failure—in confrontation with both the problem of evil and evil in its manifest form, resulting in the characters’ grossly disparate fates. The essay argues that what most distinguishes Alyosha from Myshkin is his demonstration of prudence. Prudence is necessary for one’s virtuous activity within reality, and in particular, it is necessary for the demonstration of active love. While both Alyosha and Myshkin possess lofty ideals, it is Myshkin’s lack of prudence that ultimately results in his succumbing to evil.

This essay contributes to the Comparative Literature field by developing a discourse between central philosophical questions and literary themes in two of Dostoevsky’s major novels. Furthermore, this essay posits a new theory for the crucial distinction between two of Dostoevsky’s protagonists, arguing that this distinction is responsible for the shockingly different endings of the respective novels.

Faculty Mentor

Paul J. Contino

Funding Source or Research Program

Academic Year Undergraduate Research Initiative, Summer Undergraduate Research Program

Location

Waves Cafeteria

Start Date

24-3-2017 2:00 PM

End Date

24-3-2017 3:00 PM

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Mar 24th, 2:00 PM Mar 24th, 3:00 PM

Prudence as a Prerequisite for Active Love: A Comparison of Dostoevsky’s Alyosha Karamazov and Prince Myshkin

Waves Cafeteria

This essay considers the fundamental difference between Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Alyosha Karamazov and Prince Myshkin, in The Brothers Karamazov and The Idiot, respectively. It analyzes Alyosha’s success—and Myshkin’s failure—in confrontation with both the problem of evil and evil in its manifest form, resulting in the characters’ grossly disparate fates. The essay argues that what most distinguishes Alyosha from Myshkin is his demonstration of prudence. Prudence is necessary for one’s virtuous activity within reality, and in particular, it is necessary for the demonstration of active love. While both Alyosha and Myshkin possess lofty ideals, it is Myshkin’s lack of prudence that ultimately results in his succumbing to evil.

This essay contributes to the Comparative Literature field by developing a discourse between central philosophical questions and literary themes in two of Dostoevsky’s major novels. Furthermore, this essay posits a new theory for the crucial distinction between two of Dostoevsky’s protagonists, arguing that this distinction is responsible for the shockingly different endings of the respective novels.