First Page
113
Last Page
132
Document Type
Comment
Abstract
Year after year, wildfires in California decimate property, the environment, and local communities, precipitating costly and protracted litigation. This Comment explores the advantages of mediating, rather than litigating, insurance and mass tort claims in the aftermath of these devastating natural disasters. In particular, this Comment contends that mediation benefits all parties—wildfire victims, their insurers, and alleged tortfeasors—by quickly and inexpensively resolving claims, preserving the common pool of funds to prevent insurer insolvency, and maintaining flexibility, predictability, and confidentiality. Drawing on examples of other successful disaster mediations, such as the Agent Orange case and those following Hurricanes Andrew and Katrina, this Comment proposes a structured wildfire mediation framework tailored to the needs of California’s communities, insurers, and utility providers.
Recommended Citation
Kate Hanes,
Blazing a Trail to Dispute Resolution: The Advantages of Mediating Insurance and Mass Tort Claims Following Wildfires in California,
25 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J.
113
(2025)
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/drlj/vol25/iss1/5
Included in
Disaster Law Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Insurance Law Commons, Torts Commons
