Document Type
Article
Abstract
This article analyzes the impact of the courts' ever increasing priority to enforce arbitration agreements in Truth In Lending Act (TILA) claims and reform. Part I entails a general discussion of TILA's logistics; the goals, the means, and the remedies. Part II briefly traces the rise of arbitration as well as evaluating its various advantages and disadvantages. Part III reports on the current emphasis of enforcing arbitration agreements in federal courts by explaining the basis of enforcing the agreement. Part IV explores the impact of arbitrating TILA claims on the claim and on individuals. Part V provides an analysis of class actions under TILA and examines the impact of enforcing arbitration agreements on class action procedure.
Recommended Citation
M. Susan Hale,
Charge Me, Pay Me, But Don't Even Think of Litigating Me: The Dominance of Arbitration in Truth-in-Lending Claims ,
2 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J.
Iss. 2
(2002)
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/drlj/vol2/iss2/4
Included in
Consumer Protection Law Commons, Contracts Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Legislation Commons, Litigation Commons, Other Law Commons
