Document Type
Article
Abstract
The issue I shall discuss in this article is whether the concept of mediator neutrality advances the empowering and effective participation of parties from disadvantaged groups. Section II will deal with the relationship between the concept of neutrality in the adversarial legal process, in the mediation process, and the concept of procedural justice. I shall then present the meanings ascribed to the concept of mediator neutrality in the two prevailing models of mediation: the problem-solving model and the transformative model. The affinity between these meanings and the concept of judicial impartiality will be discussed and critiqued. Finally, I shall suggest an alternative mediation ethic to neutrality that, in my opinion, may well increase the chances of furthering empowered participation among disadvantaged groups. The last part of the article will present the narrative mediation model and examine the mediation ethic on which it is based.
Recommended Citation
Ronit Zamir,
The Disempowering Relationship Between Mediator Neutrality and Judicial Impartiality: Toward a New Mediation Ethic,
11 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J.
Iss. 3
(2011)
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/drlj/vol11/iss3/11
Included in
Civil Law Commons, Civil Procedure Commons, Courts Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Judges Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, Legal Profession Commons, Litigation Commons, Other Law Commons
