Employment Discrimination Claims Remain Valid Despite After-Acquired Evidence of Employee Wrongdoing

Authors

Christine Neylon O'Brien

Document Type

Article

Abstract

This article explores the legal practice area of employment discrimination and adverse decisions based on after-acquired evidence. A division among the circuits courts arose concerning the impact of after-acquired evidence of employee wrongdoing upon an employer's liability for employment discrimination. When pre-trial discovery unveiled a separate nondiscriminatory reason for termination, numerous circuits allowed such previously unknown information to constitute a legitimate basis for the employment decision, following the model of a mixed-motive discharge. A trend developed however, among other circuits that after-acquired evidence of employee misconduct should not prevent the establishment of employer liability, but that it should be considered at the remedies phase. The United States Supreme Court affirmed the latter approach in /McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Company.

Recommended Citation

Christine Neylon O'Brien Employment Discrimination Claims Remain Valid Despite After-Acquired Evidence of Employee Wrongdoing, 23 Pepp. L. Rev. Iss. 1 (1995)
Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol23/iss1/3