Document Type
Article
Abstract
Greater reliance on arbitration to resolve cross-border disputes raises concern with the adequacy of arbitration procedural rules. In investment arbitration, transparency in the arbitrable proceedings is closely linked to the public need to review state conduct. This article draws on the responsibility of the arbitrator to balance the interests involved in an arbitration. Due consideration is given to the Global Administrative Law Project, which views many challenges affecting arbitration as the first step towards developing a global unifying standard of procedure. American domestic administrative law provides sufficient guidance in determining adequate procedure. The Mathews standard is of great value to arbitrators, especially when prior court decisions have implicitly adopted a balancing standard when reviewing the arbitrator's discretion.
Recommended Citation
Cornel Marian,
Balancing Transparency: The Value of Administrative Law and Mathews-Balancing to Investment Treaty Arbitrations,
10 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J.
Iss. 2
(2010)
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/drlj/vol10/iss2/3
Included in
Administrative Law Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, International Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Transnational Law Commons
