This short Essay considers what the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in King v. Burwell, 135 S. Ct. 2480 (2015), suggests about the future of Chevron deference. It first compares the Court’s approach in King with its approach in two other “extraordinary” nondeference cases, FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. and Gonzales v. Oregon. It next situates King in a broader context of developments in the Court’s Chevron jurisprudence. The Essay concludes that, while King may simply be a sui generis case involving an important social program, it may also signal a fading appetite for deference among the Justices. - See more at: http://pepperdinelawreview.com/the-impact-of-king-v-burwell/#sthash.EaFb9gwN.dpuf
Leandra Lederman and Joseph C. Dugan
King v. Burwell: What Does It Portend for Chevron’s Domain?,
2015 Pepp. L. Rev.
Available at: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol2015/iss1/7