Farmers Plead the Fifth: Is the Plea Against the Mandate to Reserve Raisins in Horne v. Department of Agriculture Legitimate?

Authors

Jee (Jane) Seo

First Page

602

Last Page

637

Abstract

This note addresses the relevant issues and arguments that are presented in Horne. Part II presents the historical background of the RAC, the Takings Clause of the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment, and other relevant information surrounding the Raisin Administrative Committee marketing order. Part III focuses on the facts of Horne, and Part IV discusses the procedural history of the case. The majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions are analyzed in Part V. The impact of Horne is presented in Part VI, followed by concluding thoughts on Horne in Part VII.

Recommended Citation

Jee (Jane) Seo, Farmers Plead the Fifth: Is the Plea Against the Mandate to Reserve Raisins in Horne v. Department of Agriculture Legitimate?, 36 J. Nat’l Ass’n Admin. L. Judiciary 602 (2016)
Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/naalj/vol36/iss2/7