This paper seeks to investigate the current shift from the non-intervention norm towards the “Responsibility to Protect,” commonly abbreviated as “RtoP,” which actually mandates intervention in cases of humanitarian intervention disasters. I will look at the May 2011 application of the R2P doctrine to the humanitarian crisis in Libya and assess whether it was a success or a failure. Many critics of the “Responsibility to Protect” norm consider it to be yet another imperial tool used by the West to pursue national interests, so this paper analyzes this argument in detail, referring to case study examples, particularly in the Middle East, in which Western self-interest appears cloaked under humanitarian assistance.
"The Responsibility to Protect: Emerging Norm or Failed Doctrine?,"
Vol. 9, Article 9.
Available at: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/globaltides/vol9/iss1/9
Bilingual, Multilingual, and Multicultural Education Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Comparative Politics Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International and Comparative Education Commons, International and Intercultural Communication Commons, International Law Commons, International Relations Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, Legal Theory Commons, Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons, Other International and Area Studies Commons, Other Legal Studies Commons, Other Political Science Commons, Social Influence and Political Communication Commons, Transnational Law Commons