•  
  •  
 

Authors

Ronit Zamir

Document Type

Article

Abstract

The issue I shall discuss in this article is whether the concept of mediator neutrality advances the empowering and effective participation of parties from disadvantaged groups. Section II will deal with the relationship between the concept of neutrality in the adversarial legal process, in the mediation process, and the concept of procedural justice. I shall then present the meanings ascribed to the concept of mediator neutrality in the two prevailing models of mediation: the problem-solving model and the transformative model. The affinity between these meanings and the concept of judicial impartiality will be discussed and critiqued. Finally, I shall suggest an alternative mediation ethic to neutrality that, in my opinion, may well increase the chances of furthering empowered participation among disadvantaged groups. The last part of the article will present the narrative mediation model and examine the mediation ethic on which it is based.